Also...

In who do we trust? I fear and realise, that we should respect ideals, and to the convenience of all, we happily mention all the favourable ideals come from God. Therefore, we do trust God, as and when knowing He has complete sovereignity over us, what we can be in our suffering is just to pray in worship and plead in action. Passion, my friend, is more than words, its a religion; and is more than a relationship, its a core character of servitude to the Almighty God. Therefore, appreciate what good is known and relent for what wrong is unknown, and trust the bliss, for that is the humble way to show us the blessings.

2008 has past, and 2009 has emerged, not much of a different except date changes, but the resolution for a better life will see some cooperate by the morals and others fighting by the honour. I happily contribute my share, as the ethics of a writer goes more than a profit, and engulf the passion of living correctly and in communalism. Well, fitness is a game of proving, and sometimes, we need to see life from the perspective of the original appraisal, which is concerted performance lest the difference, to realise that we need fairness more than winning, equality than more respect. My ideals are paraded here, but who am I to society where true earnest is not yet rewarded and the law of complete average has yet to turn a favourable coin to the blessings of all. This is about injustice.

I have been a victor some, and a victim much, but this rarely cast a regimen of lost, but instead gives me the unique standing there is much to improve upon the virtues and learning one can bemuse. This is like badminton, easy to learn in friendly matches, but the depth and height of talent play is a balance of compassion and aggression, that is the art waiting for an invitation to acquire and to master. This is about inadequacy, and the realising heart of positivism.

A great concern is about the boundary of our scientific world, for when we swear by the scientific torch of knowledge, can we find reconcilation with religon, adequately and reasonably? There are lots of cordial consideration here, but a regulation of order is certainly in need for compassion and integrity. To the sorrow of errors, I guess to an improvisional heart, that lack may find an answer in logic appreciated and to address the loss is to clear the mistakes but respect the person, blame the act or idea but not the soul. This goes a little way in care, and the concern is welcoming. This is inconvenience and the question of relevancy.

In capitalism, we agree perfectly fine to fair rewards and earnest encouragement, but sadly, flaws and loopholes turn the wheel against the good, that those not strong despite their ideals are cast aside, and those greedy in determination, fulfil desires and often win, only to realise the folly of competition for a humble repentence. Is life fair to perpetrate the weak not of their own fault in spite of their goodness, and is life equal for the disparity that comes to the extrapolation of the lack of competition, that only a few of the truely strong comes to an altruistic support of society, leaving a good average in selfishness? This is inequality.

Each of us are children of God in our own little penchants, and need we to fear the insidious nature that is our origin? The answer rest in our anchor, for injustice should also be justice, inadequacy should also be adequacy, inconvenience should also be convenience and inequality should also be equality. Now, if God and the world is at peace, then for in our hearts completely, is the divine laurel we can by beautiful assurance, enjoy substantially in grace and enlight absolute in peace.